Figure 2. Effective TMJ eminence results. (A) Eminence height (mm), predicted by the model vs. measured, for a given postero-anterior position from 0 to 5.0 mm anterior to a retruded condylar position, in 0.5-mm increments, for subject m1 ("worst-case", ) and subject m4 ("best-case", *). (B) Sagittal morphology of the effective TMJ eminence in each of the six subjects. The vertical axis represents the eminence height (mm) relative to a retruded condylar position and perpendicular to the occlusal plane, and the horizontal axis represents condylar protrusion (mm) from the retruded position. Function beyond 5 mm of protrusion was unlikely, since this placed mandibular incisors anterior to maxillary incisors in all subjects.